From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 23:39:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09BB37B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1F343FD7 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:39:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc0s4.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.3.132] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19PzGj-0004fK-00; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:39:37 -0700 Message-ID: <3EE6CE5A.C5024CDA@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:38:18 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stijn Hoop References: <200306101342.h5ADgHQ26446@mailgate5.cinetic.de> <20030610135856.GQ12096@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a478c07e41c9e96520cfe912bd319c389c666fa475841a1c7a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Thorsten Greiner Subject: Re: ACPI Regression in -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 06:39:42 -0000 Stijn Hoop wrote: > This is due to the Dell laptops having an invalid ACPI table in the BIOS. > The only way to avoid these messages is to tell FreeBSD ACPI to override > the vendor supplied table with a correct one. Alternately, since Microsoft works just peachy with this thing, it's somewhat apparent that the Derefof() and Refof() can be implied by the types of the values being passed, and the ACPI table parsing code should be changed to work like Microsoft's does, at least until FreeBSD displaces the 70% marketshare and can dictate defacto implementation standards, where Intel can't. Yeah, I know that it's better to be correct than Microsoft compatible, but it's also better to work with hardware as shipped by vendors. Unless you think you can get Dell to rev their BIOS... -- Terry