From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 7 16:37:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF7016A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:37:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC26243D1D for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:37:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0906.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 52A681C00212 for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:37:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0906.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 00F781C001EA for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:37:38 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050207163739404.00F781C001EA@mwinf0906.wanadoo.fr Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 17:37:36 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1069313008.20050207173736@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <200502061420.24415.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <849739867.20050207170757@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: favor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:37:41 -0000 Eric Kjeldergaard writes: EK> To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the EK> freebsd-questions Archives. EK> EK> Since we are discussing implicit contracts, I would think that the EK> announcement that the collection of prior postings is linked to and EK> mentioned/described to be reasonable notification that the mailing EK> list gets archived. It's not. And there must be no other way of subscribing in order for this method to be valid, anyway. Why do you think that software companies and Web sites and other organizations require you to check a box to accept terms and conditions, instead of just assuming that you read and understand them when they are displayed? -- Anthony