From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Nov  6 19:24:51 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from lavender.sanpei.org (lavender.yy.ics.keio.ac.jp [131.113.47.22])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1833E37B4C5; Mon,  6 Nov 2000 19:24:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sanpei@localhost)
	by lavender.sanpei.org (8.11.0/3.7W) id eA73OGM04758;
	Tue, 7 Nov 2000 12:24:16 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200011070324.eA73OGM04758@lavender.sanpei.org>
To: kris@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
From: sanpei@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/4.0-stable was not updated from 2000/April/25.
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:19:21 -0800"
References: <20001106191921.B6581@citusc17.usc.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.34.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 12:24:15 +0900
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

  Yes, I know cvsup and personally I use cvsup.

  But that direcotry would confused novice user.  If no one update
these directory, I hope to remove that ``branches/4.0-stable''
directory from ftp.FreeBSD.org.

>On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:59:48AM +0900, sanpei@FreeBSD.ORG wrote:
>> Hi.
>> 
>>   In ftp.FreeBSD.org, below files were not updated from
>> 2000/April/25.... Why.....
>> 
>> 	ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/4.0-stable/
>> 
>>   I hope to sync latest 4-stable FreeBSD tree.
>
>Use cvsup, it's much more efficient at syncing, since the majority of
>the code does not change from one release to another.


Cheers.
---
MIHIRA, Sanpei Yoshiro
Yokohama, Japan.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message