From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 10:52:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090F216A412 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from matrix.gatewaynet.com (host2.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C48E43C9F for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:52:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from host3.dynacom.ondsl.gr ([62.103.35.211] helo=ip216.internal.net) by matrix.gatewaynet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Gwz3i-0001fA-5j for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:52:26 +0200 From: Achilleas Mantzios Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:52:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com> In-Reply-To: <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612201252.25858.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:52:29 -0000 =CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 =CE=A4=CE=B5=CF=84=CE=AC=CF=81=CF=84=CE=B7 20 =CE= =94=CE=B5=CE=BA=CE=AD=CE=BC=CE=B2=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=BF=CF=82 2006 11:39, =CE= =BF/=CE=B7 Eugeny N Dzhurinsky =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:05:31PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 12/20/06, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:15:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > >> Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > >> > looks like I need to map libpthread.so.1 - not libpthread.so.2? > > >> > > >> If you're using 5.x, stay away from libthr - it was much slower back > > > > > >then. > > > > > >And it doesn't work well ;) > > > > Didn't! :) > > I was unable to test it with 6.1 at home, so I'm not sure. Btw, is it > possible to enable libthr for any application in FreeBSD 6.1 somehow, or = it > is probably not a good idea? I think this is a current hot topic of debate, take a look at=20 http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&q=3Dlibpthread+vs+libthr&btnG=3DGoogle= +Search =46or your case i'd say, stick with libpthread for all apps (default) excep= t=20 java (use libthr there) =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios