From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 08:02:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE1010656A3 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9448C8FC1C for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:02:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3M81PWM004924; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:01:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n3M81Ojx004921; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:01:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:01:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20090422061032.GA55757@thought.org> Message-ID: References: <1240369698.1037.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090422075238.b932cf9c.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090422061032.GA55757@thought.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon , Christopher Chambers Subject: Re: Disk usage analysis X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:02:11 -0000 >> >> These are called directories. >> >> You don't call files "sheets of paper" either, do you? :-) > > YES!! I'm probably too up-tight about the use of "folder", > but it just seems like waaaaaay too much stupiding-down of the > std Unix terminology. ([I thought I was the only one]. And yes, > there are things of greater gravitas to be ticked off about!) > it's just stupid to pursue windoze/maclame naming where names are ALREADY present!