Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:11:05 +0100 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: share/pixmaps vs include/X11/pixmaps Message-ID: <200502131411.05993.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <20050213031515.GB32587@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050213031515.GB32587@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 13 of February 2005 04:15, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Similarly a number of ports put files in share/pixmaps instead of > include/X11/pixmaps. Should this directory be added as well? Hmm, I'd personally actually prefer share/pixmaps to be in mtree instead of include/X11/pixmaps. Include seems somewhat wrong for images although X11 distributions also install them there... Hmmm... I'd vote for adding share/pixmaps in mtree though. Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502131411.05993.dejan.lesjak>