From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 6 22: 9:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DEC37B400 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 22:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4075D43E52 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 22:09:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from duhring@charter.net) Received: from [24.217.145.63] (HELO dave.uhring.com) by dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 62702865; Sun, 07 Jul 2002 01:09:02 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Dave Uhring To: Jason Porter , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Better to make XFree86-4 when XFree86-3 isn't running? Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 00:09:06 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: <3D27CB01.1000504@xmission.com> In-Reply-To: <3D27CB01.1000504@xmission.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200207070009.06225.duhring@charter.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday 07 July 2002 12:00 am, Jason Porter wrote: > I'm running XFree86 version 3.3.6 I think (or whatever the 3 version > is that 4.5 came with). Would it be better to make version 4.2.0 > without X running? I also know I'll need to change XF86Config file, > but that's not too much of a problem. Thanks for the help. If you are using an ATI Rage Pro video adapter you would be well advised=20 to completely avoid the newest version of XFree86. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message