From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 8 09:11:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE6C16A41F for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBC643D46 for ; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:11:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c220-239-19-236.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.19.236]) by mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA89BCeW021827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:13 +1100 Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jA89BCHh078142; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:12 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from pjeremy@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id jA89BCcY078141; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:12 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from pjeremy) Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:11:12 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Charles Swiger Message-ID: <20051108091112.GU39882@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20051107140451.GU91530@cell.sick.ru> <436F7DDB.40703@mac.com> <20051107224338.GE775@funkthat.com> <20051107234548.GF775@funkthat.com> <036D3BD4-D856-4D50-A7D3-2300EFEA604F@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <036D3BD4-D856-4D50-A7D3-2300EFEA604F@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP request retransmitting X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:11:16 -0000 On Mon, 2005-Nov-07 19:49:30 -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: >does, and what the switch actually does. In particular, switch >vendors have also claimed that VLAN tagging was reliable and secure >and that traffic from one VLAN could never leak to a port on another >VLAN...) ISTR that some years ago, I did a check and found that ~0.5% of packets in our corporate network were being leaked into the incorrect VLAN. [Though my memory may be going] I haven't looked recently. I've also got a switch that believes that VLANs are only related to IP - it will happily copy DECnet packets to all switch ports irrespective of VLAN associations. (And this switch came from the company that DEC sold their switch business to). -- Peter Jeremy