Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Jul 2020 10:25:52 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Neel Chauhan <neel@neelc.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Reviewing two IPFW/netgraph/natd patches (RFC 6598/Carrier Grade NAT)
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmonicngK3Uw7JkxHRy=fzaYLGLsDo4aQkaN4rNGTb%2BfUUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b1ec99d49eae16fba27ccd234db42207@neelc.org>
References:  <b1ec99d49eae16fba27ccd234db42207@neelc.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi!

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 20:12, Neel Chauhan <neel@neelc.org> wrote:

> Hi freebsd-hackers@, freebsd-net@,
>
> These two patches that will be described are a continuation of r357092.
>
> r357092 added support for RFC 6598/Carrier Grade NAT (subnet:
> 100.64.0.0/10) in libalias and IPFW in-kernel NAT.
>
> These two patches add support for RFC 6598 to natd and ng_nat
> respectively:
>
>   * natd CGN patch: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23356
>   * ng_nat CGN patch: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23461
>
> Currently, CGN support is missing from natd and ng_nat.
>
> Could someone please review and/or commit these patches?
>

I'm happy to commit these if noone complains too much to me about it.

I approved one of them. I'll go approve the other now.



-adrian


>
> Best,
>
> Neel Chauhan
>
> ===
>
> https://www.neelc.org/
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonicngK3Uw7JkxHRy=fzaYLGLsDo4aQkaN4rNGTb%2BfUUw>