From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jun 13 5:38:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9ED237B419; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17ITsN-0000Y1-00; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:38:55 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Cyrille Lefevre , Juli Mallett , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The Source Code Control System In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:03:24 +0200." <1467.1023969804@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: <2108.1023971935@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:03:24 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > Hmm. It might be nice to have around as a port, but I don't > > > see why it would need to be in the base system. We just > > > > maybe because they are required by SUSV3 : > > > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/utilities/ > > That's a bit misleading. The sccs utility is clearly marked as an XSI > extension. I should have mentioned that I have no objection to the inclusion of these utilities in the base system. I just wanted to clarify the status of sccs with respect to the standard. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message