Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 03:58:58 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c pkg_create.1 pl.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile delete.h main.c perform.c ... Message-ID: <2CD52765-EC03-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040812012909.GA25768@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ken Smith wrote: > nOn Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:35:33AM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >> Before I get a million replies to this commit: When anyone from re@ >> thinks it is worth the effort, I will add an -c option to the C >> pkg_version code ASAP. I believe backing this out won't be beneficial >> for -STABLE users, since they'll loose a lot of features (and speed). >> Has anyone on this thread *ever* used that option? > > I would like to see the -c added please. I know it seems like busywork > but we have historically tried to make sure existing semantics don't > change in -stable without a really really really good reason. > Additional > features (and speed ;-) are always welcome/good as long as existing > semantics don't change. If you need any help or want to discuss it > let me know. Ok, I'll write a patch then. -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2CD52765-EC03-11D8-887A-00039312D914>