From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 18 11:07:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278BC16A4CE for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A718243D2D for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so480562rng for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:07:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=EBD3XDM6LGsA8MNYBtAV+UcsafSvjZUcZH3yxCNtLqslkRnL4UlQe6wOYotjmxA2n/iqsvW9tol5sU9uP8SYnKHnQyt8ok9G7ouLUCpzmioH2xLSI/VW9fguod8NXNDBuVIOrFZxdgbU+5PC4FlWsziGn5+SDa2MwyNVEu+tSuw= Received: by 10.38.10.25 with SMTP id 25mr248457rnj; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.151.77 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:07:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18f60194050218030737b807bd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:07:15 -0800 From: Aaron Glenn To: David Rice In-Reply-To: <200502171636.10361.drice@globat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200502171636.10361.drice@globat.com> cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High traffic NFS performance and availability problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Glenn List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:16 -0000 On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:36:10 -0800, David Rice wrote: > The problems we are having is as follows. > > 1. Slow perfomance during peek traffic periods > 2. Client boxes have high load averages and sometimes crashes due to slow NFS > performance. > 3. File servers that randomly crash with "Fatal trap 12: page fault while in > kernel mode" > 4. With soft updates enabled during FSCK the fileserver will freeze with all > NFS processs in the "snaplck" state. We disabled soft updates because of > this. > > I can provide and other details about our configuration if needed. > > David Rice > drice@globat.com > > Thank You Just how many MB/s are you pushing during peak periods? How are the file servers connected to the clients? What have you looked it with vmstat? Why did you move to 5.x on your file servers? Are you tracking -STABLE on those, or just -RELEASE? By the way they're Xeon's - not Xenon's (-: aaron.glenn