From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 22:25:28 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0E11065675
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:25:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172408FC19
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:25:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5KMPNNW001689;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:25:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5KMPMwn001686; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:25:23 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:25:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <20120621001809.da9ce415.freebsd@edvax.de>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206210023450.1403@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org>
	<402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de>
	<20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at>
	<4FE1AD27.8000704@gmail.com>
	<CAH3a3KWHYC+pbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1340192731894-5720039.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<4FE1BD0E.5060300@pukruppa.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416540.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+0MdpOftiWE+1Gqn5USxu87RPB_7WAGTXnOGU0dp99CMXMYTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201644190.1476@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAJ5UdcOwD-gpw548fkHnuzUp3R+wTOPvna5Z8J079T4VVKGB=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206202204520.3174@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120620224030.1a0dc3b4.freebsd@edvax.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206202353080.1403@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120621001809.da9ce415.freebsd@edvax.de>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:25:23 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
	Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:25:28 -0000

> You're being paid to write a program for a customer. You

i don't talk that case, but if i am hired to write some part of program as 
an employer in software company.

>> So - if authors of any project, no matter how numerous, will all
>> without exception agree that they want to get rid of GPL, then - they
>> always can turn it to BSD
>> licenced ? am i right?
>
> A general consensus of the issuers of the license ("continuous
> licensing") could maybe do that, I assume. Still there would
> be the possibility to create a fork (common means in open source
> when something needs to be changed that doesn't go well with
> "mainstream"), and that fork could keep the old license. Now
> there are two independent projects.

that is fine.

>
> BUT - as everyone is free to obtain, modify and re-issue GPL
> source code, I'm not sure such a consensus could be reached.
by creating a BSD licenced fork - constructed from parts written by all 
developers that - as you said - have personal right to their code.