Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:05:27 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Cc:        doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade
Message-ID:  <20120412150527.GA15996@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CADLo839V4BtuRF-ze6qS3xvU1kYsi_7KoChP7WFaYx5D59oZBA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:26:59AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
> Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular
> with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that
> the Handbook lists it first.

fwiw, the last I talked to stass@, he still considers himself the
maintainer and that it should not have been deprecated.

However, I still think we should list portmaster first.  It and
portupgrade are what are used by the vast majority of our users.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120412150527.GA15996>