From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 15:05:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E21106566B for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F888FC15 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 423EB56205; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:05:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:05:27 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Chris Rees Message-ID: <20120412150527.GA15996@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Doing the deed" on portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:05:35 -0000 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:26:59AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: > Even since its deprecation, portupgrade has proven to be very popular > with newcomers, which I might be inclined to blame on the fact that > the Handbook lists it first. fwiw, the last I talked to stass@, he still considers himself the maintainer and that it should not have been deprecated. However, I still think we should list portmaster first. It and portupgrade are what are used by the vast majority of our users. mcl