From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Apr 20 23:16:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDE937B424; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 23:16:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3L6GPN09128; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 02:16:28 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010420152946.O19393@nexus.root.com> References: <83033.987782742@critter> <20010421001450.C77032@skriver.dk> <20010420152946.O19393@nexus.root.com> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 02:16:23 -0400 To: David Greenman From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3-RC5 now on ftp.freebsd.org Cc: developers@FreeBSD.ORG, Jordan Hubbard , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 3:29 PM -0700 4/20/01, David Greenman wrote: >someone wrote: > > And even in "normal" situations, it's quite hard to actually > > get all the bit's from ftp.freesoftware.com ... > > You are right that the performance has sucked generally >for awhile, however. Lightning has been bandwidth limiting us, >resulting in lower performance than what people had gotten >used to. Does this mean we won't be seeing any more record-breaking data-transfer statistics? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message