From owner-freebsd-cluster Tue Dec 10 15:15:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8665637B401 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:15:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CC043EC5 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:15:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rminnich@lanl.gov) Received: from ccs.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (8.12.3/8.12.3/(ccn-5)) with SMTP id gBANFHgp014517 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:15:17 -0700 Received: (qmail 5743 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 16:15:17 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO carotid.ccs.lanl.gov) (128.165.148.162) by 128.165.148.1 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 16:15:17 -0700 Received: (qmail 1858 invoked by uid 3499); 10 Dec 2002 16:15:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 16:15:16 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:15:16 -0700 (MST) From: "Ronald G. Minnich" X-X-Sender: rminnich@carotid.ccs.lanl.gov To: Mike Hoskins Cc: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sharing files within a cluster In-Reply-To: <20021210144140.F80524-100000@fubar.adept.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > no, please check out Plan 9, cluster-wide /proc is not a good thing. At > > most you want the bproc-style proc. > > Did you mean "At most..." or "At least..." ? I ask, because if bproc is > the maximal desired implementation, what is a minimal implementation IYO? I mean at most. I like Plan 9 somewhat better. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message