From owner-cvs-all  Sun Nov  7 22:53:33 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7F5C314BF5; Sun,  7 Nov 1999 22:53:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from peter@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from peter@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA48641;
	Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:53:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from peter@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <199911080653.WAA48641@freefall.freebsd.org>
From: Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:53:31 -0800 (PST)
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_module.c
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

peter       1999/11/07 22:53:31 PST

  Modified files:
    sys/kern             kern_module.c 
  Log:
  A hack basically..  We have a bunch of code that used to call
  devsw_module_handler() indirectly and not use the chain arguments.  To
  eliminate this indirection via that function (which does nothing now)
  without duplicating a modevent handler into all the routines that don't
  presently have one, supply a NOP (do nothing, return OK) routine which
  is functionally equivalent to what's there now.  This is a hack and is
  still wrong, because there doesn't appear to be anything to reclaim
  resources on an unload of a module with one of these in it.  I'm not
  sure whether to make the NOP handler refuse a MOD_UNLOAD event or what.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.21      +9 -2      src/sys/kern/kern_module.c



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message