From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 14 17:51:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD39A16A41A for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:51:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F291713C44B; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47125736.1060900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:51:50 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Morozovsky References: <471530484.20071014172230@masm.elcom.ru> <47121CCA.6080202@FreeBSD.org> <89402349.20071014201513@masm.elcom.ru> <20071014210533.D97516@woozle.rinet.ru> <47125444.8090405@FreeBSD.org> <20071014214310.S97516@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20071014214310.S97516@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7.0 CURRENT, need help with panic: Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:51:54 -0000 Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > KK> > VMB> >> FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT, Sun 10 Oct 2007. > KK> > VMB> >> VMB> >> Problem have appear at pid 27 cmd=[Irq11: rl0], then PFil > KK> > hooks are > KK> > VMB> >> worked. I have no idea how to fix it. Can you help me? > KK> > VMB> > ipfilter is known to be broken. > KK> > VMB> Is this problem exist on 7-CURRENT or in every BSD-branch? > KK> > VMB> Waiting for fix? > KK> > > KK> > According to our tests, ipfilter is not workable at least for SMP and > KK> > RELENG_[5-7] > KK> > KK> Well if so then it is not the same issue as this one. Have you filed a PR? > > I did not, as I'm not quite remember all the details; oleg@ should, I'll ask > him tomorrow. > > Well, a bit of clarification: we never actually tried to use ipf part > of ipfilter, it was ipnat. OK, step 1 on the road to a fix is obviously reporting the bug :) Kris