From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 2 10:25:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCF216A4E2; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431E543D4C; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:25:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01770170C6; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 10:25:44 +0000 (UTC) To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:24:08 GMT." <200609021024.k82AO8Sp025334@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:25:44 +0000 Message-ID: <16104.1157192744@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/102766: geom panics when devices go away X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 10:25:46 -0000 In message <200609021024.k82AO8Sp025334@freefall.freebsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawi dek writes: >Take this PR. I still think such situations should be handled in >GEOM, not in every single GEOM class. ehh. Only the classes know how to handle this, GEOM shouldn't try to guess the internal logic of GEOM classes. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.