Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:30:01 -0800 (PST) From: Roland Jesse <jesse@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/9835: Port update: squeak2 Message-ID: <199901312330.PAA78486@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/9835; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roland Jesse <jesse@prinz-atm.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Subject: Re: ports/9835: Port update: squeak2 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 00:23:58 +0100 Bill Fumerola wrote: > > +# Date created: 30 January 1999 > > +# Whom: jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de > > No. These two values are for the initial creation. Sorry about this. > No. Please don't clear the $Id: $ tags, even if this is how things were > done, you're missing a ":" dito. Usually, I do not need $Id: $. RCS fills in a $Id$ tag just fine. > > -MAINTAINER= nectar@FreeBSD.ORG > > +MAINTAINER= jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de > > Did you ask the original maintainer? No, not for this specific update. But we did have some discussion about the squeak port some time ago (when 2.2 was current). The initial port (now: lang/squeak1) was done by me. I did not have the time to do any squeak2 porting (as I was studying at another university for a year without access to a FreeBSD machine), so he did it. Now, I just updated the port as I am was compiling 2.3 anyway. Is there anything wrong about it? Regards, Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901312330.PAA78486>