From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 22 12:34:46 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA15934 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 12:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from kilgour.nething.com (kilgour.nething.com [204.253.210.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA15927 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 12:34:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from randy.nething.com (randy.nething.com [204.253.210.83]) by kilgour.nething.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA05393 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 1996 14:33:31 -0600 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 14:33:31 -0600 Message-Id: <2.2.16.19960222143435.35875eca@nething.com> X-Sender: rberndt@nething.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Randy Berndt Subject: Diamond stealth 64 vram vs #9 motion 771 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Can anyone give me any kind of real-world comparison as far as speed and feature differences between these cards. Looking at X, and maybe Win95. Cost seems to be about the same, both 2meg vram, I think both S3. So what is the honest difference? Has diamond come around and given info to X? This will be used with an ASUS P55TP4XE, P120 or P133, and a Sony 17se monitor. Win95 would be running 800x600, 24bpp, I don't know if X does that or not. TIA. Randy Berndt ---------------------------------- AOS/VS, FreeBSD, DOS: I'm caught in a maze of twisty little command interpreters, all different.