From owner-freebsd-smp Thu Oct 5 12:18:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1D837B502; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:18:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e95JIgK00736; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:18:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA01346; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:18:42 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010051918.NAA01346@harmony.village.org> To: John Baldwin Subject: Re: Releasing interrupts? Cc: smp@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 12:14:31 PDT." References: Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 13:18:42 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message John Baldwin writes: : You may be able to orchestrate a way to have your thread call kthread_exit(), : which would work. The person to bug for a kthread_cancel() is Peter though. : :) OK. kthread_exit() is likely sufficient for my needs in NEWCARD. I can queue a poison pill as easily as I can queue an INSERT or REMOVED event :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message