Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 08:23:18 +0100 From: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd) Message-ID: <20010128082318.U253@speedy.gsinet> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101271919450.35303-100000@espen.oysnet.lan>; from oys@powertech.no on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 07:20:16PM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101271919450.35303-100000@espen.oysnet.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 19:20 -0500, Espen Oyslebo wrote:
>
> Ipfw and ipf to my eye (without glasses that is) seem to do
> pretty much the same thing. The same is true for ipnat and
> natd. Of course there are differences between the two (ritgh?).
>
> If so:
> What are they?
This has been hashed over a few hundred times in the lists. You
might want to visit the archives.
> Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is
> there any point in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it
> ain't broken).
Exactly! If it works for you, why would you want to risk it? If
you feel like something's missing, what is it? Then check if ipf
could do it for you.
virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net
--
If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
ask your parents or an adult to help you.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010128082318.U253>