Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:44:38 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 245270] ls(1) man page describes LSCOLORS wrong
Message-ID:  <bug-245270-9-zDDIxGxesq@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-245270-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-245270-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245270

VVD <vvd@unislabs.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vvd@unislabs.com

--- Comment #1 from VVD <vvd@unislabs.com> ---
My experience.

* 12.1 amd64
* x11/konsole
* default TERM=3Dxterm-256color

Without bold color:
$ export LSCOLORS=3Dexfxcxdxbxegedabagacad
$ ls -G /
look same as with bold color for dirs:
$ export LSCOLORS=3DExfxcxdxbxegedabagacad
$ ls -G /
but this output is correct with different color for dirs:
$ export TERM=3Dxterm-16color
$ export LSCOLORS=3DExfxcxdxbxegedabagacad
$ ls -G /

I tested different combinations of the colors for the dirs: ex, Ex, eX, EX,=
 ea,
Ea, eA, EA - look same with TERM=3Dxterm-256color (my default background is
black).
Background always isn't bold even with TERM=3Dxterm-16color.

P.S. x11/konsole have option to draw bold colors as custom colors - Intence
colors.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245270-9-zDDIxGxesq>