From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 10 21:11:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE4D16A419; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC9A13C4B7; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.187]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4210B4721A; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:54:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74135-01; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:54:17 -0400 (AST) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71807B471D9; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:54:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445023D0AE; Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:54:19 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:53:56 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Ivan Voras , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5803BE560EBD58C6EF0E8FC7@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1E865507A930162B67FB75DE@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: gclusterfs ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:11:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Saturday, November 10, 2007 21:32:36 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Anyone play with this? >> >> It says it runs under FreeBSD, but am curious if anyone is using it 'in >> production' and how well it works ... > > As far as I can see it uses FUSE for the file system driver, and when I > last looked at it (at least our version of...) FUSE doesn't support file > locking (flock(2), etc., not kernel locking), so at best it would be of > limited use (e.g. no databases, mbox mailboxes, etc. on it). Actually, FAQ 'How is locking handled?' NOTE: GlusterFS only supports fcntl() locks, as FUSE itself doesn't support flock() calls. > - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHNhpk4QvfyHIvDvMRAi6VAKDmt0vtcjC22zZDGwhhX/guO2DL2QCfdTQx K/4RyWPlTHioPsM2cyLbITQ= =bP6G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----