From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 19 12:17:31 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FF8106566C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:17:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37418FC14
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:17:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>) id 1Qj9Ev-0002DI-1b
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:17:29 +0200
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:17:29 +0200
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:17:29 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:17:17 +0200
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <j03skd$qp2$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <4E20BA23.13717.66C6F57@markmcconnell.iinet.com>	<201107181402.12755.jhb@freebsd.org>	<797CACDE-729E-4F3A-AEFF-531C00C2B83A@samsco.org>	<201107181714.07827.jhb@freebsd.org>	<4F739848-E3CE-4E2C-A91E-90F33410E7AC@samsco.org>
	<4E251C96.5050105@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6
In-Reply-To: <4E251C96.5050105@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Subject: Re: disable 64-bit dma for one PCI slot only?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:17:31 -0000

On 19/07/2011 07:56, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 19.07.2011 1:22, Scott Long wrote:
>>>> Btw, I *HATE* the "chip" and "card" identifiers used in pciconf.  Can we change it to emit
>>>> the standard (sub)vendor/(sub)device terminology?
>>>
>>> Oh, yeah.  I hate that too.  Would you want them as 4 separate entities or to just rename the
>>> labels to 'devid' and 'subdevid'?
>>>
>>
>> If we're going to change it, might as well break it down into 4 fields.  Maybe we retain the old
>> format under a legacy switch and/or env variable for users that have tools that parse the output
>> (cough yahoo cough).
>
> Hi, Scott
>
> i think for keeping POLA it is better add new option to make new output format.

This is a too strict interpretation of POLA! If the change is done for 
better compliance with standards and it is done in a major version (i.e. 
9.0 or 10.0), it's not a matter of POLA (otherwise, the change will 
never happen).