Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Apr 1997 23:11:56 -0700
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        Thomas Pfenning <thomaspf@microsoft.com>
Cc:        "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>, Randall Hopper <rhh@ct.picker.com>, multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bt848 Missing frames fix 
Message-ID:  <199704170611.XAA01378@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:28:15 PDT." <88CE23A0B727D0118BB000805FD4752401606328@RED-81-MSG.dns.microsoft.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Hi Doc,

Care to tell us how does the Bt848 look in Win9x or NT? 
That is when you get a chance.
Or for that matter anyone out there running Win95 can also volunteer
the Win95 info.


	Tnks,
	Amancio

>From The Desk Of Thomas Pfenning :
> I think you are right. It manifests itself in highly visible steps on
> sloped lines. However, I only see this at 24bit color depth. At 15 bit
> everything looks okay.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 	Thomas
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Louis A. Mamakos [SMTP:louie@TransSys.COM]
> > Sent:	Wednesday, April 16, 1997 7:45 PM
> > To:	Randall Hopper
> > Cc:	Amancio Hasty; multimedia@freebsd.org
> > Subject:	Re: Bt848 Missing frames fix 
> > 
> > I've also noticed the occasional case where the system seems to lock
> > up pretty tight.
> > 
> > In my case, it seems to be related to having fxtv's view window
> > resized
> > to something between the default "small" size, and full size and
> > having
> > a marginal input signal.  It might be related to occasional
> > loss-of-sync
> > sort of provocation, but its not real clear.  In my case, I don't
> > recall
> > still seeing live pictures on the display, but the box hasn't reset;
> > I'm
> > still hearing the audio through the soundcard mixer.
> > 
> > Also, as I've mentioned to Randall, I think that the even/odd fields
> > are
> > interchanged.  Someone else mentioned this before, and it seems
> > noticable if you look at text and graphical objects on the tv
> > broadcast.
> > I recall looking at this a little while ago, and I thought that the
> > way the RISC program were being built had the wrong field (even or
> > odd?)
> > starting off in the memory buffer.  Is it just me, or is anyone else
> > noticing this?
> > 
> > louie
> > 





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704170611.XAA01378>