From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 29 22:51:03 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59D616A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:51:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbtm.yonsei.net (sbtm.yonsei.net [61.100.191.60])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF8743D2D
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:51:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from perky@sbtm.yonsei.net)
Received: by sbtm.yonsei.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 35A3128434; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:51:01 +0900 (KST)
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:51:01 +0900
From: Hye-Shik Chang <perky@i18n.org>
To: Khairil Yusof <kaeru@streamyx.com>
Message-ID: <20031230065101.GA22443@i18n.org>
References: <20031229143701.GC947@streamyx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031229143701.GC947@streamyx.com>
X-Accept-Language: ko, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: python version, modules and Zope
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 06:51:03 -0000

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 10:37:01PM +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote:
> I'm starting to try port most of the Plone/CMF collective and any
> dependencies, and I'm encountering this problem.
> 
> USE_ZOPE=yes forces PYTHON_VERSION=python2.1
> 
> What happens is that, any python module dependencies, gets installed in 
> python2.1 site-packages directory, and usually conflicts with one
> installed as python2.3. eg.
> 
> py21-imaging vs py23-imaging
> 
> Although they should co-exist peacefully, as they are installed in
> separate directories, make install will complain that an older version
> of py-imaging (py23-imaging in this case) is already installed. Similarly
> portupgrade will try to  upgrade py21-imaging to py23-imaging.

Do you have up-to-date ports tree? Recursive version keeping in a
dependent builds is added recently into bsd.python.mk and python
modules that have same origin are co-exist even on my pkgdb too.

% ls -d /var/db/pkg/py2*-cjkcodecs*
/var/db/pkg/py21-cjkcodecs-1.0.2/  /var/db/pkg/py23-cjkcodecs-1.0.2/
/var/db/pkg/py22-cjkcodecs-1.0.2/

But we need to register py22-*, py21-* ports to HOLD_PKGS of
portupgrade, because there's no mechanism to keep build-time
environment variables on pkgdb.


Hye-Shik