From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jan 29 9:14:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from picnic.mat.net (picnic.mat.net [206.246.122.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DEE15E4B for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 09:14:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chuckr@picnic.mat.net) Received: from localhost (chuckr@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by picnic.mat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA67483; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:13:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chuckr@picnic.mat.net) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:13:51 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey To: Ilia Chipitsine Cc: Ade Lovett , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: another problem - dependency ... (Re: who the hell ported GNOME ??) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Ilia Chipitsine wrote: > > > (This time I've realized how cool it was done with RPMs...) > > > Isn't it a time to move to any sane packaging system, such as RPM or > > > Debian ??? > > > > See the mailing lists archives for all the gory details of the > > (many) times this has been discussed :) > > yes, I seen dicsussion about it, > but could anybody remind me why current packaging system > is better than Debian ?? Ade said go read the archive on that. Why don't you, instead of trying to start up a flamewar? We've covered this ground more than once. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include C & Java programming, FreeBSD, chuckr@picnic.mat.net | electronics, communications, and signal processing. New Year's Resolution: I will not sphroxify gullible people into looking up fictitious words in the dictionary. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message