From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 15:20:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B107D16A4CE for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:20:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C695143D1D for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i13NKDFR077111 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i13NKDCR077110; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402032320.i13NKDCR077110@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Lukas Ertl Subject: Re: kern/62228: Kernel improperly identifies partition size ofconcat (grown) vinum volume X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lukas Ertl List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:20:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/62228; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Lukas Ertl To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, eo@shell-server.com Cc: le@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/62228: Kernel improperly identifies partition size of concat (grown) vinum volume Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 00:16:36 +0100 (CET) > su-2.05b# cd > su-2.05b# umount /usr/local/media > su-2.05b# fsck /dev/vinum/media > ** /dev/vinum/media > ** Last Mounted on /usr/local/media > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > fsck: /dev/vinum/media: Segmentation fault > su-2.05b# ls -l *.core > -rw------- 1 root wheel 22872064 Feb 1 15:37 fsck_ufs.core Would it be possible for you to get a backtrace out of that? > Furthermore, I'm not sure if this is normal: > > su-2.05b# disklabel /dev/vinum/media > disklabel: /dev/vinum/media: no valid label found That's normal, vinum doesn't fake disklabels anymore. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ le@FreeBSD.org http://people.freebsd.org/~le/