From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:00:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BFC16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:00:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132E643D5D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:00:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E0B1FF91D; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:00:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 3620E1FF90C; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:00:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 6447B155E3; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:52:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A162155AE; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:52:51 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Luigi Rizzo In-Reply-To: <20040114130122.A86000@xorpc.icir.org> Message-ID: References: <20040114130122.A86000@xorpc.icir.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for review: ipfw2 for IPV6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:00:12 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > We would really appreciate testing by someone who is a kernel programmer > who has access to ipv6 network and some knowledge of the ipv6 code, > and thus can give advice on how to improve this code, and possibly > suggest fixes for the trivial bugs that are there. Just skipped over it: - patch should also be easily ported to HEAD - have not seen any #ifdef INET6 - will this break INET only setups ? - why is a file from Attic in the diff ? - can someone also please update the manpage ? Will be happy to have a closer look at it once the IPSEC issue got sorted out and I will finally have v6 here. -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/