From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 15 20:30:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536F716A412 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darkside@swipnet.se) Received: from amsfep16-int.chello.nl (amsfep17-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4859243D4C for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:30:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darkside@swipnet.se) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (really [213.89.209.56]) by amsfep16-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20061015203047.GLW25943.amsfep16-int.chello.nl@[192.168.0.5]> for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:30:47 +0200 Message-ID: <45329A7E.1010108@swipnet.se> Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:30:54 +0200 From: Nyaano User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: GEOM vinum and SMP (AMD64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darkside@swipnet.se List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:30:51 -0000 Hi, I've just tried out FreeBSD 6.2-BETA2 (AMD64) on a Core2Duo E6300. I installed the SMP kernel without any problem, made a gvinum configuration and created a RAID5 volume. I can mount it without any problems, and I added geom_vinum_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf and the appropriate line in /etc/fstab after creating a filesystem on the volume. After that, I do a simple shutdown -r now because I want to make sure that everything starts up the way it should. When the system comes to the point where it's going to mount the RAID5 volume, it complains about the superblock and says it's corrupt. With exactly the same configuration, but with the GENERIC kernel, everything works without any problems. Before I spend more time on trying to get this working with SMP, I'd like to know if this is a known problem, and if it's not, what information is needed from me in order to track down what the problem is. Thank you, Nyaano