From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Feb 21 14:45:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA28615 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 21 Feb 1998 14:45:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hwcn.org (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA28533 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 1998 14:45:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by hwcn.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA03515; Sat, 21 Feb 1998 17:41:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 17:41:13 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: "Justin M. Seger" cc: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, hoek@james.hwcn.org, hoek@james.hwcn.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: how many tk version do oyu need... In-Reply-To: <199802212213.RAA19772@freebsd.scds.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Justin M. Seger wrote: > You should ideally have them use tcl/tk81. I plan to start changing ports to > use tk81, I've just been really busy during this past week. This should maybe wait until after the release of 2.2.whatever. OTOH, if done before, it would have be able to take advantage of the additional testing usually given to each package (in theory) before releases. Maybe it shouldn't. I'm terribly indecisive today. ;-) -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk [Yow! How did hoek@james.hwcn.org sneak into the Cc:, and twice at that! james should be well-hidden from email addresses] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message