From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 26 11:53:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from hawaii.conterra.com (hawaii.conterra.com [209.12.164.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51D3152CF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 11:53:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from myself@conterra.com) Received: from dmaddox.conterra.com (root@dmaddox.conterra.com [209.12.169.48]) by hawaii.conterra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA07915 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:53:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from myself@localhost) by dmaddox.conterra.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA00466 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:53:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from myself) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:53:28 -0400 From: "Donald J . Maddox" To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Demand-loaded network ifs and bpf Message-ID: <19990926145328.A430@dmaddox.conterra.com> Reply-To: dmaddox@conterra.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I see that support has been added for demand-loading network if drivers. I seem to recall that the last time I tried using network drivers as klds, nothing that required bpf to work was functional anymore, because bpf required that the device existed at the time it was initialized. Is this still the case? Will bpf work for demand-loaded network klds? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message