From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 14 06:26:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17A516A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:26:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hyperreal.org (taz3.hyperreal.org [209.237.226.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 721E543D45 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:26:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brian@collab.net) Received: (qmail 47260 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 06:26:46 -0000 Received: from localhost.hyperreal.org (HELO fez.hyperreal.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 06:26:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 95094 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Jan 2005 06:26:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 06:26:44 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:26:43 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Behlendorf X-X-Sender: brian@bez.hyperreal.org To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1105665920.44698.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Message-ID: <20050113222618.T4668@bez.hyperreal.org> References: <200501132346.j0DNkwDG047009@freefall.freebsd.org> <1105665920.44698.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/75642: gnomespeech fails to build if a jdk is installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:26:42 -0000 On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 17:16 -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: >> It continues to happen for me. It's on a box that is pretty much >> exclusively a build box, nothing installed that wasn't installed via a >> port. What other information can I provide to help you reproduce this? > > Try it now. There was one small bug that may have resulted in Java > support being enabled even when it shouldn't have been. Yep, works great now, thanks! Brian