From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 28 23:59:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA6716A41F for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:59:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A1643D45 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:59:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jASNwsBW070446; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:58:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jASNwrkq070443; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:58:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:58:53 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051128141419.02e9ae48@pop.msdi.ca> Message-ID: <20051129005408.G69275@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20051128182431.I64067@chylonia.3miasto.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20051128141419.02e9ae48@pop.msdi.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: good instability on FreeBSD/amd64 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:59:06 -0000 thank all for the answers that made me sure i was reading nonsense. Now i can install FreeBSD/amd64 6.0 being sure i will get stable (and fast) system. As stable as my FreeBSD/i386 6.0 system, on which FreeBSD is the only OS in which 2 CPUs works fine. not new hardware, dual PII/400 "Compaq Professional Workstation", on which NetBSD quickly crashes with SMP enabled, Linux works not much faster than on one CPU with fast serial working (and i don't like to use linux), FreeBSD runs fast well using both CPUs It's easily using up both CPUs for apps under both low and high disk/network load, so giant locks isn't that a problem now in 6.0.