Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 14:24:59 +1000 From: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> To: mva@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r361429 - in head/devel: . py-omnijson Message-ID: <53C0B89B.4030307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140710115509.Horde.IJjs3G4wdi8VhTC861np3Q3@webmail.df.eu> References: <201407100850.s6A8oPAU054740@svn.freebsd.org> <20140710115509.Horde.IJjs3G4wdi8VhTC861np3Q3@webmail.df.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/07/2014 7:55 PM, Marcus von Appen wrote: > > Kubilay Kocak <koobs@freebsd.org>: > >> Author: koobs >> Date: Thu Jul 10 08:50:24 2014 >> New Revision: 361429 >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/361429 >> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r361429/ >> >> Log: >> [NEW] devel/py-omnijson: Wraps the best Python JSON installed >> >> Wraps the best JSON installed, falling back on an internal simplejson. >> >> Features: >> >> * Loads whichever is the fastest JSON module installed >> * Falls back on built in pure-python simplejson, just in case. >> * Proper API (loads(), dumps()) >> * Verndorizable >> * Supports Python 2.5-3.2 out of the box > > Is USE_PYTHON=yes correct then? Or shouldn't that be USE_PYTHON= -3.2? > > Cheers > Marcus > > I'm assuming the trove classifiers are out of date, but in case they're not, created: https://github.com/kennethreitz/omnijson/issues/6 I'm also going to run the three unit tests under 3.4 myself to check
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53C0B89B.4030307>