Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:19:47 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, eivind@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: import NetBSD rc system Message-ID: <20010616091947.B81063@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106160758380.25983-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>; from gordont@bluemtn.net on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 08:04:42AM -0700 References: <20010616012430.B39762@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0106160758380.25983-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 08:04:42AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I also had an idea to break out the network init into several different > pieces falling under 2 headings LINK (ether, atm) and NETWORK (ipx, ipv4, > ipv6, atalk). I've started work on breaking everything out and was > wondering if I should continue with it or if it just too much of a change. Yes it is too much of a change. Let me restate again that the idea right now is to just *minimally* port the NetBSD RC scripts. Once we have a system booting with RCng, we can see where it blows and discuss changes. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010616091947.B81063>