From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 7 16:45:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from internal.mail.demon.net (internal.mail.demon.net [193.195.224.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A9737BE91 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2000 16:45:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fanf@demon.net) Received: from fanf.eng.demon.net (fanf.eng.demon.net [195.11.55.89]) by internal.mail.demon.net with ESMTP id AAA01237; Sat, 8 Apr 2000 00:45:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from fanf by fanf.eng.demon.net with local (Exim 3.12 #3) id 12diQw-000Ebm-00; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 00:45:02 +0100 To: freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net From: Tony Finch Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Overwhelming messages from /sys/netinet/if_ether.c In-Reply-To: <200004072000.NAA41303@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <200004071926.MAA00894@papermill.wrs.com> Message-Id: Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 00:45:02 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: >David Holloway wrote: >>>Mathew Kanner wrote: >>>I haven't tried this but how about changing the >>>/sbin/dhclient-script to not use 0.0.0.0 as the address that wakes >>>up the interface. >> >> No... > >Yes... that is just the type of thing the link local RFC reserved address >space is for. No... IP address 0 is reserved for "me" so its use in DHCP makes sense. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch fanf@demon.net dot@dotat.at 393 dirt clods in your fuel rods To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message