From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr 21 19:17:13 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA28972
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 19:17:13 -0700
Received: from pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (root@pluto.ops.NeoSoft.COM [198.64.212.23])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA28964
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 19:17:06 -0700
Received: from metal.ops.neosoft.com (root@glenn-slip54.nmt.edu [129.138.5.154]) by pluto.ops.NeoSoft.com (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id VAA18171 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 21:17:03 -0500
Received: (from smace@localhost) by metal.ops.neosoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.10) id UAA04161 for hackers@freebsd.org; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 20:16:53 -0600
From: Scott Mace <smace@metal-mail.neosoft.com>
Message-Id: <199504220216.UAA04161@metal.ops.neosoft.com>
Subject: 2.x and large memory configs
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 20:16:53 -0600 (MDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 113       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Has anyone used FreeBSD 2 (or the snaps) with large mem configs like
around 128megs?  (EISA or PCI bus).

	Scott