From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 16 14:52:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31D116A4CE; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:52:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1951E43D31; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:52:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2GMuoee050508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:56:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i2GMqUGa004326; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:52:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 00:52:30 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040316225230.GO3462@ip.net.ua> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UFMLoheMaWcIEZAi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libalias patch for review / testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:52:29 -0000 --UFMLoheMaWcIEZAi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:14:23PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav) writes: > > Anybody running natd on -CURRENT, please test the attached patch >=20 > Umm, here's a patch that actually compiles. >=20 I know this code quite well. Where do you suspect could be a bug affecting -O2 compiles, or you just simply fixed -O2 and hope it will auto-fix the (possible) bugs in -O2? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --UFMLoheMaWcIEZAi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAV4UuUkv4P6juNwoRAjCFAJ92LXEHoPF33O4Vhj199j31rFc4OQCfbDlJ vugtAxdWref9mm/mdGdUd/4= =RYTF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UFMLoheMaWcIEZAi--