From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 12 07:24:15 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA05753 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from Lapkin.RoSprint.ru (root@Lapkin.RoSprint.ru [193.232.88.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA05709 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:24:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from Lapkin.RoSprint.ru (sandy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Lapkin.RoSprint.ru (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA02350; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:23:08 +0300 Message-ID: <311F5B56.FF6D5DF@lapkin.rosprint.ru> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:23:02 +0000 From: Sandy Kovshov Organization: RoSprint Moscow X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lehey CC: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , "Hackers; FreeBSD" Subject: Re: CCITT support in current References: <199602121405.PAA07290@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Greg Lehey wrote: > It looks like FreeBSD would be the ideal vehicle for a Minitel server, > but it would mean getting the X.25 up to scratch (and conformant with > Transpac, which is based on the 1980 standard). I remember reading a > while back that somebody was working on this--are you listening, > somebody? In any case, is anybody else interested in development in > this direction? Of course I'm still workin in this direction. But I think what nobody wants to use it. So it comes to be a private project because nobody interesting with support for old (?) protocols :( -- --- Sandy E-mail: Internet: sandy@dream.demos.su sandy@www.RoSprint.ru X.400: (C:USSR,A:SOVMAIL,O:SNUSSR,UN:A.KOVSHOV) X.400: (C:USA,A:TELEMAIL,O:SPRINTINTL,UN:A.KOVSHOV)