From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 12 17:27:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D194D16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 17:27:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531E343D91 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 17:27:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so271424rng for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:27:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hKCsGYBM7N+NwXBHgBM372isMDUD+rfJX/2B2REDdHFMTc8/Q8D0xtjHEa1BsKAlGbj5qq6JpUD3NQor1l5zWhVXuq3c0WCItujulhOK6TYU22TwapB37cGRR2QZPWlYPakoutAooF+WrCMD9P4J7+Co8wrrdppubEyXNarTmvc= Received: by 10.38.90.9 with SMTP id n9mr170417rnb; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.39.1.30 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2005 10:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3aaaa3a05051210277bf6ab2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:27:15 +0100 From: Chris To: Steven Jurczyk In-Reply-To: <4282E139.7030908@post.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4281FBC9.5040506@post.pl> <4096.212.12.51.89.1115816916.squirrel@212.12.51.89> <3aaaa3a050511162864263c74@mail.gmail.com> <4282E139.7030908@post.pl> cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Marian Hettwer Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:27:18 -0000 Ok thanks I will stick to the old scheduler on my smp system then. Chris On 5/12/05, Steven Jurczyk wrote: > Chris wrote: >=20 > >Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 > >onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning > >on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. > > > >Have you guys tried this without SMP? > > > > > Yes. > pthreads applications under SCHED_ULE but without SMP works OK... >=20 > PS. Please remeber that SCHED_ULE with SMP brokes also >10 utils > compiled with pthreads in base system (host, dig, nslookup -> all DNS > stuff). > -- > best regards > steve at home.pl >=20 >