From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jun 12 13:47:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-bugs Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA02008 for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA01985 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tom@localhost) by misery.sdf.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id NAA29184; Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:55:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 13:55:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Bruce Evans cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/633 In-Reply-To: <199606121018.UAA16266@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 12 Jun 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > >"ndbm" is a backwards-compatible naming convention. "dbm" is the actual > >library these days which has long since taken on all the special features > >of "ndbm" > > `db' (inside libc) is the actual library. It provies the apparently- > undocumented dbm backwards compatibility interface which is the subject > of the PR. Exactly. There is no manpage for dbm_open, dbm_close, dbm_fetch, etc., which are part of the ndbm interface, even though these functions are a part of libc. Tom