Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:22:18 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239682] Default to devel/llvm90 when libLLVM/libclang are required or if /usr/bin/clang is not enough Message-ID: <bug-239682-21738-tkIdXv2skX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239682-21738@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239682 --- Comment #36 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- Only Mesa because it will remain stuck on llvm80 for years due to complicat= ions with QA and build system. I don't think anything else can affect Gnome. If = you find more regressions, please, report. Binary package estimates: /latest around Saturday evening. Delays mainly come from ports r513733 and ports r513734. /quarterly around Sunday morning as previous build hasn't finished yet. (In reply to Brooks Davis from comment #33) Bug noise is a good argument. I'll think of a solution e.g., splitting into many bugs, removing CC after approval, mailing off-bug. "typical pkg set" argument is double-edged, sacrificing many for the few. If LLVM_DEFAULT is too old (e.g., misses some C++20 stuff or has bugs only fix= ed in later version) it may lead to individual ports hardcoding llvm versions. However, some like Mesa can avoid RUN_DEPENDS by statically linking. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239682-21738-tkIdXv2skX>