From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 16 09:54:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7AB9316A4CE; Sun, 16 May 2004 09:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from citi.umich.edu (citi.umich.edu [141.211.133.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5D0F443D48; Sun, 16 May 2004 09:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rees@citi.umich.edu)
Received: from citi.umich.edu (dsl093-001-248.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[66.93.1.248])	by citi.umich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 78A602080B; Sun, 16 May 2004 12:54:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: "Poul-Henning Kamp", Sun, 16 May 2004 04:28:46 +0200
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 12:54:28 -0400
Sender: rees@citi.umich.edu
Message-Id: <20040516165428.78A602080B@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/enigma enigma.1 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 16:54:30 -0000

  You're pretty wrong about it being unsafe.

It's unsafe unless used correctly.  So I guess we're in agreement.  But how
useful is a cipher that has to be re-keyed every 200 characters?  And how
likely is it to be used correctly?