From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Jan 30 21:31:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA17951 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 21:31:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from zap.io.org (zap.io.org [198.133.36.81]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA17932 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 21:30:58 -0800 (PST) Received: (from taob@localhost) by zap.io.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id AAA04399; Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:30:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 00:30:28 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Tao To: David Greenman cc: FREEBSD-CHAT-L , ftp@wcarchive.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Memory configuration of ftp.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199601300751.XAA02145@Root.COM> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 29 Jan 1996, David Greenman wrote: > > Okay, I just changed it to: > > 256MB of main memory (72pin, 16M x 36bits x 60nsec SIMMS X 4) > > ...happy now? :-) Well, technically you're not multiplying 16M*36 bits*60ns*4, because that would give you 145 gigabit-nanoseconds, whatever that is. "256 MB of main memory (4*16M*36-bit 60ns 72-pin ECC SIMM's)" would work. (or whatever) -----^^^ :) Sorry, a customer nitpicked a similar point with me on the phone today, and I'm still a wee bit ticked off at him. :) -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org) Systems Administrator, Internex Online Inc. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"