From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 7 18:40:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B971CA6; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39811F85; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D38B1FE022; Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:40:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <552424C6.3040005@selasky.org> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 20:41:10 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: svn commit: r281024 - head/share/man/man4 References: <201504031400.t33E094r076234@svn.freebsd.org> <20150407164223.GI64665@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20150407164223.GI64665@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:40:28 -0000 On 04/07/15 18:42, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Hans, > > 4 days ago I asked you to back this out, and my request was > ignored. Can you please back this out now? > > Yes, it is an interesting stuff, but doesn't belong to the > documentation. If you strongly disagree with me, I'd suggest > to advocate Mike Silbersack, who is author of the code. If he > agrees that additional information on covert channels is > important, the text can be put back. > Hi Gleb, I was busy with other stuff. Sorry for not responding. Yes, I agree that the text does not have to be that lengthy. I'll cut it down. --HPS