From nobody Tue Jan 3 15:59:07 2023 X-Original-To: pf@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NmcqH2hlWz2p1dF for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NmcqH1DsVz3mr9 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1672761547; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VHu0BLB38TXytlyEGod9GC0JQpadkeYwhIIJgye9ozI=; b=B1pP4sviRIqPQNTCYrztYu1F/m6J66rFFOrSSkypBJXAOtlFnbGHIU1vSrz4J4fZ/m2VKL NSmrNNbcRqv1qNkl46V17QmOnsSCsHypcQxwdAnu1EdIStEljIQdrBR7weFeLF02WSdaiS fkdxi8Mx+95uA96nZLZdPlUS2A4qFzYMqpHlwF3GXxTmihGjXmrNNWmXuhYm8AhFKAln8m CmewR+JVqjF3vlcl5l2cXR0CzoeopeyfWZq5a2t+hIDR6o+uaLV7enPPROrdAyqDSNUlk1 y+l7/WlwJ91CjK9HxhUHnZmmgQADcA2naNneA8c63jFpz4sLOXniwLNhbA6g4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1672761547; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Rvk0a1cp8CnFsepp0wR3NhTLDSd+0nYmS9xg6C4YVWMr+0eDsydhvd56wV+S3WfmpzUW+h yuING0daMTeUVjL3kSYENmaLOS/R/Y81zwTkf2J3Tg7LuhUZ3zW4fhcI2mmPzdXj4SyyC5 wgrHlL6fBsqWqFmlyH2gELnJMid4k6GuXGXaf2MUu7SPchS+6T6AEnGceuXt51cIWkCVBz 8mTSEJ9Zt4IeQPOJPe4kPa7XebVtYm490udPzQsJwEcB/Ogy9ERNsECkh2qZdie8Mx9gNz iBBbsm5rNiHsEf6QYXQhIuIv4AMofXj1q9m1ud398ug2m7E1HTUnt4bANdM3bg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NmcqH0KyTzcwW for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 303Fx6IY039011 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:59:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 303Fx6EG039009 for pf@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 3 Jan 2023 15:59:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 268717] [pf] rdr rules don't work for traffic originating at localhost Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 15:59:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: dfr@rabson.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pf@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pf List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268717 --- Comment #3 from dfr@rabson.org --- Further testing show more strangeness. If I add a second vnet jail on the s= ame bridge and attempt the telnet that should redirect, it also fails. The rule matches when the host receives the SYN and is re-written and directed to the first jail. The SYN+ACK reply doesn't match the state entry and is transmit= ted without reversing the redirect. I've added a second test script to set this up - run the script then 'jexec testvnet2 telnet 10.123.0.1 8080' --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=